Thirty Semifinalists Named in ‘Minnesota Cup’ Business Plan Competition
I attended and Twittered a bit at a reception Wednesday evening, June 25, at the grand, old James J. Hill Library in downtown St. Paul. (You remember old J.J., don’t you, the Bill Gates of his era?) It was an event to honor the startups who made it to the next round of the Minnesota Cup, an annual, statewide competition that seeks out aspiring entrepreneurs and their breakthrough ideas. The 30 lucky semifinalists were selected from a record of 840 entries in this fourth and largest year of the competition, and will vie for prizes that include $50,000 in cash for the first-place winner. An interesting tidbit I picked up at the reception: about 10% of the 840 entrants were Web 2.0 related.
Scott Litman, cofounder of the event, told me the competition this year was the toughest ever, and that many plans that might have made the cut in previous years didn’t. He also told me that, unfortunately, many entrants may have had great business concepts, but they were not understandable — the submissions were either poorly written, or riddled with so many acronyms and buzzwords that the judges flat-out did not know what the heck the submitter was talking about. (So, take heart, rejectees. You may be great at selling your ideas verbally — now work on the written word.)
Here’s how the Minnesota Cup site states its mission: “We’re looking for the next great entrepreneurial success story in our state. This competition is for all entrepreneurs, whether your breakthrough idea is high tech or no tech, whether you are just putting your ideas into a business plan or if you’ve been out building your venture.” Well, I wonder if it’s possible that any who entered, and especially the chosen semifinalists, could really be “no tech” in this day and age? That would be hard to imagine. And, in looking over the list, there’s nary a one that would seem not to rely on technology in their businesses. (Although some without a website certainly have the aura of no-tech at this point, perhaps awaiting prize money to build? And what’s with all the student semifinalists being listed with no websites?) As for the lack of a requirement that the business be new, i.e., that older startups can also apply, I know at least two on the list are four to five years old and still chasing $50k. Ah, hope springs eternal. Here’s the full list: Read more
Minnesota’s Internet Tech Crowd Flexes Its Muscle
If one had any doubt about the intensity of our state’s information technology and Internet community, one only had to be anywhere inside the U’s Coffman Union on Saturday for the third annual Minnebar “unconference” (part of an international phenomenon called Barcamp). To say the joint was a-jumpin’ simply does not suffice. And numbers alone don’t tell the story (though attendance was an event record at 430). Rather, it was the intensity of energy through the entire day that could only impress one about this somewhat quiet, and definitely underrated, sector of Minnesota’s economy.
I was there for at least 12 hours of the event — yes, it went on that long, and no one was complaining — and I can surely say that even the most skeptical of attendees who sacrificed part of their spring weekend were impressed with what they experienced, and left beaming with an elevated sense of pride in the industry they’re a part of. One needs only to scan the voluminous talk that went on in real-time — thanks to the magic of Twitter, and all archived here — to see that something big was happening in the Gopher state on this rainy fishing-opener Saturday. (In fact, Minnebar was ranked during the day as one of the top-five conversations going on in the entire, global “Twitterverse.”) Read more
State of the State: Technology in Minnesota. A Minnebar Panel Discussion
One of the highlights of Saturday’s Minnebar was a panel discussion entitled, State of the State: Technology in Minnesota. The panelists included: Douglas Olson (Microsoft), Jamie Thinglestad (formerly of Dow Jones), Michael Gorman (Split Rock Partners), Robert Stephens (Geek Squad), Dan Grigsby (Unpossible), Matthew Dornquast (code42).
Ed Kohler at Technology Evangelist has a post with highlights here. You can also listen or download the one hour podcast below.
‘Minnebar’ Becoming Top Event for State’s Internet/Software Developers and Entrepreneurs
An annual Minnesota event, playfully named Minnebar — which grew out of a grass-roots tech industry initiative called Barcamp — is happening for the third year in a row here in the Twin Cities this coming Saturday, May 10, at the U of M’s Coffman Union.
By 8:00 am, somewhere between 300 and 400 software developers, startup founders (and hopefuls), web designers, interactive marketers, local media reporters, angels, VCs, and other investors will start converging in one place as they seldom do in any venue in these parts, at any other time throughout the year.
They come to talk shop, learn, share tips, listen to presentations on the latest tech developments and tools, share war stories, listen to startup pitches, and (of course) take notes, blog, and Twitter about all the proceedings on the laptops and smart phones they never seem to have far from their sides. Read more
The Latest on U of M Technology Innovation and Commercialization
The University of Minnesota is among the top patent producers in the world, ranking #4 on Scientist Magazine’s list of “Patent Powerhouses,” behind only three other major American universities. Yet, quantity of patents hardly paints the entire picture. What about helping to start up companies to commercialize those patents?
According to the U’s own business development people (see link to Powerpoint presentation at bottom), the 20-year success record of the U’s technology company spinoffs is only half the university average nationally — and less than one-fourth the success record of the nation’s premier schools. What’s more, in one recent year (2004), for example, the U of MN spun off only one company compared to 14 at the University of Michigan and 16 at the University of Illinois. Why I am focusing here on spinoffs? Well, because, according the U’s own business development people, creating university spinoffs is “much more profitable than licensing (revenues)” to the school. Read more
Innovation in Early-Stage Investing? You Bet! And MN Firm Is Major Player
It’s no secret the gap between friends-and-family financing and venture capital funding is big enough to drive a…well, a busload of entrepreneurs through. But I’m here to tell you, friends, there’s hope on the horizon.
The capital needs of early-stage companies used to be served well by VC funds, but the aforementioned gap has been growing ever wider in recent years as most VCs have moved toward later-stage deals. Since the beginning of time, individual angel investors have been a factor in helping young companies with their capital needs. But never before have they had to step up as an organized force to address such a big problem as we now face in our country, and right here in Minnesota.
The good news for all you entrepreneurs out there is that angels remain your best friends, because they’ve been banding together increasingly in groups to better fuel the capital needs of emerging companies.
So, why is this such an important issue? “If we’re not investing enough as a society in growth capital, we won’t grow jobs,” says Pete Birkeland (pictured here), CFO of St. Paul-based RAIN Source Capital. And his firm, the biggest little Minnesota investment firm you’ve never heard of, is doing much to innovate the process. Other members of RAIN’s management team are listed here.
Get this: RAIN Source is now the largest network of managed angel funds in the country, coming a long way in recent years in case you haven’t been watching. “We’re on the cutting edge,” said Birkeland. RAIN Source now numbers 24 funds in its network (including three licensees), across Minnesota, Iowa, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, and Idaho. And it already has its expansion sights clearly set on Oregon, Washington, and Florida.
The company’s RAIN Funds® are made up of angel investors interested in supporting growing companies. It helps organize these angel groups, providing part of of the capital for their funds, as well as legal templates, a process for due diligence, management support, access to deal flow, and other resources. The individual funds share expertise, deals, and experience between and among the other funds (angel groups) across RAIN Source Capital’s multi-state network. These groups range in size from seven to 61 members, with each pooling from $500,000 to $2 million in their own fund. The RAIN Source network currently has more than $25 million invested in 43 companies across its entire multi-state presence. At current count, RAIN has $17 million in available capital. And, since members can make side investments in any of RAIN’s deals, it estimates that at least another $17 million is available for investment.
-
The "Minnov8 Gang" Podcast
